{"id":14771,"date":"2026-02-25T09:00:46","date_gmt":"2026-02-25T14:00:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cila.co\/?p=14771"},"modified":"2026-02-20T18:57:52","modified_gmt":"2026-02-20T23:57:52","slug":"understanding-immigration-detention-in-canada","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/understanding-immigration-detention-in-canada\/","title":{"rendered":"Understanding Immigration Detention in Canada"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><strong>Authored by Amit Vinayak, Barrister &amp; Solicitor, Law Society of Ontario, Member of CILA<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h3><!--more--><\/h3>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Canadian immigration law provides a framework for the detention of foreign nationals and permanent residents under specific circumstances, with the Immigration Division (ID) of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB) playing\u00a0a central role\u00a0in reviewing these detentions. The process is governed primarily by the\u00a0<\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Immigration and Refugee Protection Act<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0(IRPA) and its associated regulations.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Grounds for Immigration Detention<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">An individual may be detained by immigration authorities if there are reasonable grounds to believe they are inadmissible to Canada and pose a danger to the public, or are unlikely to appear for an examination, admissibility hearing, or removal from Canada (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/laws.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/i-2.5\/section-55-20030101.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Immigration and Refugee Protection Act &#8211; Laws.justice.gc.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [55(1)], [55(2)(a)]).\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Detention can also occur if an officer is not satisfied of the individual&#8217;s identity (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/laws.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/i-2.5\/section-55-20030101.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Immigration and Refugee Protection Act &#8211; Laws.justice.gc.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [55(2)(b)]).\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Upon entry into Canada, a person may be detained if an officer\u00a0deems\u00a0it necessary to complete an examination or has reasonable grounds to suspect inadmissibility on security or human rights grounds (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/laws.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/i-2.5\/section-55-20030101.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Immigration and Refugee Protection Act &#8211; Laws.justice.gc.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [55(3)]).\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The ID itself may order detention if it is satisfied that a permanent resident or foreign national is subject to an examination, admissibility hearing, or removal order, and is a danger to the public or unlikely to appear (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/laws.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/i-2.5\/section-58-20171018.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Immigration and Refugee Protection Act &#8211; Justice Laws Website<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [58(2)]).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0For designated foreign nationals, the ID is mandated to order continued detention if specific grounds exist (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/laws.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/i-2.5\/section-58-20171018.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Immigration and Refugee Protection Act &#8211; Justice Laws Website<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [58(1.1)]).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The Detention Review Process<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">When an individual is taken into detention, an officer must promptly notify the Immigration Division (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/laws.justice.gc.ca\/eng\/acts\/i-2.5\/section-55-20030101.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Immigration and Refugee Protection Act &#8211; Laws.justice.gc.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [55(4)]). The detention review process is designed to ensure regular oversight of immigration detention.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The\u00a0initial\u00a0review must occur within\u00a048 hours\u00a0of detention, followed by another review within seven days, and then at least every\u00a030 days\u00a0thereafter.\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">For designated foreign nationals aged 16 or older, the\u00a0initial\u00a0review is within\u00a014 days, and\u00a0subsequent\u00a0reviews occur every six months.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">At each review, the Minister bears the ongoing burden to justify\u00a0the continued\u00a0detention on a balance of probabilities. The ID must consider\u00a0various factors, including the reason for detention, the length of time already spent in detention, the likelihood and potential duration of continued detention, any unexplained delays or lack of diligence, and the availability of alternatives to detention (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/scc\/doc\/2019\/2019scc29\/2019scc29.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina, 2019 SCC 29 (CanLII)<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [55]). The legal burden to justify detention never shifts to the detainee during these hearings (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/fct\/doc\/2024\/2024fc1980\/2024fc1980.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Hemond v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 1980 (CanLII)<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [46]).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Rights of Detainees<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Individuals in immigration detention have fundamental rights, including\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">the right to counsel,<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0the right to an interpreter, and<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0the right to be present at their detention review hearings.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0Importantly, detainees are not compelled to testify at these hearings, and no adverse inference can be drawn from their silence.\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The principle of non-compellability, as a principle of fundamental justice under section 7 of the\u00a0<\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, applies to immigration detainees at detention review hearings under section 57 of the IRPA. Decisions by an ID member to compel a detainee to testify have been found to be unreasonable as they unjustifiably limit these Charter rights (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/fct\/doc\/2024\/2024fc1980\/2024fc1980.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Hemond v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [5], [82]).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Special Considerations for Minors<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The best interests of the child (BIOC) are a primary consideration in all decisions involving minors. The detention of minors is considered a measure of last resort and should be for the shortest possible duration.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Alternatives to Detention (ATDs)<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Detention is considered a measure of last resort in the Canadian immigration system (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canada.ca\/content\/dam\/ircc\/migration\/ircc\/english\/resources\/manuals\/enf\/enf34-eng.pdf\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">[PDF] ENF 34: Alternatives to Detention program &#8211; Canada.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">). At every detention review, the ID must consider alternatives to detention (ATDs). These alternatives are designed to mitigate identified risks while allowing individuals to remain in the community. Common ATDs include:<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li aria-setsize=\"-1\" data-leveltext=\"\uf0b7\" data-font=\"Symbol\" data-listid=\"11\" data-list-defn-props=\"{&quot;335552541&quot;:1,&quot;335559685&quot;:720,&quot;335559991&quot;:360,&quot;469769226&quot;:&quot;Symbol&quot;,&quot;469769242&quot;:[8226],&quot;469777803&quot;:&quot;left&quot;,&quot;469777804&quot;:&quot;\uf0b7&quot;,&quot;469777815&quot;:&quot;multilevel&quot;}\" data-aria-posinset=\"1\" data-aria-level=\"1\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Reporting Conditions<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">: Requiring individuals to report regularly to immigration authorities.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li aria-setsize=\"-1\" data-leveltext=\"\uf0b7\" data-font=\"Symbol\" data-listid=\"11\" data-list-defn-props=\"{&quot;335552541&quot;:1,&quot;335559685&quot;:720,&quot;335559991&quot;:360,&quot;469769226&quot;:&quot;Symbol&quot;,&quot;469769242&quot;:[8226],&quot;469777803&quot;:&quot;left&quot;,&quot;469777804&quot;:&quot;\uf0b7&quot;,&quot;469777815&quot;:&quot;multilevel&quot;}\" data-aria-posinset=\"2\" data-aria-level=\"1\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Financial Guarantees<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">: A deposit of money to ensure compliance with release conditions (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canada.ca\/content\/dam\/ircc\/migration\/ircc\/english\/resources\/manuals\/enf\/enf34-eng.pdf\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">[PDF] ENF 34: Alternatives to Detention program &#8211; Canada.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li aria-setsize=\"-1\" data-leveltext=\"\uf0b7\" data-font=\"Symbol\" data-listid=\"11\" data-list-defn-props=\"{&quot;335552541&quot;:1,&quot;335559685&quot;:720,&quot;335559991&quot;:360,&quot;469769226&quot;:&quot;Symbol&quot;,&quot;469769242&quot;:[8226],&quot;469777803&quot;:&quot;left&quot;,&quot;469777804&quot;:&quot;\uf0b7&quot;,&quot;469777815&quot;:&quot;multilevel&quot;}\" data-aria-posinset=\"3\" data-aria-level=\"1\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Community Case Management and Supervision (CCMS)<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">: This program provides in-community support to manage and mitigate risk, particularly for individuals who lack a bondsperson or require\u00a0additional\u00a0support (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canada.ca\/content\/dam\/ircc\/migration\/ircc\/english\/resources\/manuals\/enf\/enf34-eng.pdf\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">[PDF] ENF 34: Alternatives to Detention program &#8211; Canada.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li aria-setsize=\"-1\" data-leveltext=\"\uf0b7\" data-font=\"Symbol\" data-listid=\"11\" data-list-defn-props=\"{&quot;335552541&quot;:1,&quot;335559685&quot;:720,&quot;335559991&quot;:360,&quot;469769226&quot;:&quot;Symbol&quot;,&quot;469769242&quot;:[8226],&quot;469777803&quot;:&quot;left&quot;,&quot;469777804&quot;:&quot;\uf0b7&quot;,&quot;469777815&quot;:&quot;multilevel&quot;}\" data-aria-posinset=\"4\" data-aria-level=\"1\"><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Electronic Monitoring (EM)<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">:\u00a0Utilizing\u00a0technology like GPS to\u00a0monitor\u00a0an individual&#8217;s whereabouts (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canada.ca\/content\/dam\/ircc\/migration\/ircc\/english\/resources\/manuals\/enf\/enf34-eng.pdf\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">[PDF] ENF 34: Alternatives to Detention program &#8211; Canada.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">ATD options can be combined to effectively offset various risks. Conditions of release must be tailored, proportionate, and minimally impair an individual&#8217;s liberty (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canada.ca\/content\/dam\/ircc\/migration\/ircc\/english\/resources\/manuals\/enf\/enf34-eng.pdf\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">[PDF] ENF 34: Alternatives to Detention program &#8211; Canada.ca<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Challenging Detention<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">While the ID has\u00a0jurisdiction\u00a0over the grounds for detention and release, it does not have authority over the location or conditions of detention. Lengthy or indeterminate immigration detention may be challenged through an application for\u00a0<\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">habeas corpus<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0if the IRPA&#8217;s review process is\u00a0deemed\u00a0inadequate.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The Supreme Court of Canada in <\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Canada\u00a0<\/span><\/i><b><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">(Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina<\/span><\/i><\/b><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, 2019 SCC 29<\/span><\/b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, held that the IRPA&#8217;s review procedure is not as broad and advantageous as\u00a0<\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">habeas corpus<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0when challenging the legality of detention based on its length and uncertain duration (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/scc\/doc\/2019\/2019scc29\/2019scc29.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [59], [68]). This is because the onus in detention reviews is less\u00a0advantageous\u00a0to detainees, the scope of Federal Court review is narrower, and\u00a0<\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">habeas corpus<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0offers a\u00a0more timely\u00a0remedy (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/scc\/doc\/2019\/2019scc29\/2019scc29.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Chhina<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [59]).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">However, the Federal Court of Appeal in\u00a0<\/span><b><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Brown v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration<\/span><\/i><\/b><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">)<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, 2020 FCA 130, affirmed that the immigration detention scheme, with its robust and timely review mechanisms, the Minister&#8217;s burden of proof, and judicial scrutiny, does not infringe sections 7, 9, or 12 of the\u00a0<\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Charter<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0(<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/ca\/fca\/doc\/2020\/2020fca130\/2020fca130.html\"><span data-contrast=\"none\">Brown v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 130 (CanLII)<\/span><\/a><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, [22], [37]).<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Conclusion<\/span><\/b><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Immigration detention in Canada is a significant legal measure, reserved for circumstances where there are serious concerns about public safety, flight risk, identity, or ongoing investigations into inadmissibility. The process is governed by clear statutory and regulatory frameworks designed to ensure that detention is not\u00a0arbitrary\u00a0and that individual rights are protected. Detention review hearings before the Immigration Division of the IRB provide detainees with regular, meaningful opportunities to challenge\u00a0their continued detention and to propose alternatives that may allow for release under\u00a0appropriate conditions.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Ultimately, the\u00a0detention review process is a cornerstone of procedural fairness in Canadian immigration law, reinforcing the principle that deprivation of liberty must always be justified, proportionate, and subject to independent review.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;335551550&quot;:6,&quot;335551620&quot;:6}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p><strong>About the Author:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Amit Vinayak<\/p>\n<p>Barrister &amp; Solicitor<\/p>\n<p>Partner, MDVD Lawyers LLP<\/p>\n<p>LSO # 82057U<\/p>\n<p><strong>Disclaimer:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The content provided in this article is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should not act upon any information contained herein without first seeking appropriate legal or professional counsel based on their individual circumstances. The author and the publisher disclaim any liability in connection with the use of this information.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Authored by Amit Vinayak, Barrister &amp; Solicitor, Law Society of Ontario, Member of CILA<\/p>","protected":false},"author":115,"featured_media":13861,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[224,644,78,739,158,24],"class_list":["post-14771","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-thought-leadership","tag-cbsa","tag-fcc","tag-federal-court","tag-immigration-detention","tag-inadmissibility","tag-ircc"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/115"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14771"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14771\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14775,"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14771\/revisions\/14775"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14771"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cila.co\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}